• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV EVOLUT PRO TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV EVOLUT PRO TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV Back to Search Results
Model Number EVOLUTPRO-29-US
Medical Device Problem Codes Gradient Increase (1270); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190); Activation Failure (3270); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001); Thickening of Material (4056); Unspecified Valve Regurgitation (4080)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Foreign Body Reaction (1868); Thrombosis/Thrombus (4440); Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4450); Insufficient Information (4580); Transvalvular Pressure Gradient Increased (4854)
Date of Event 05/15/2019
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that 6 years and 11 months following the implant of a transcatheter aortic valve, an unspecified valve failure occurred.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that 6 years and 11 months following the implant of a transcatheter aortic valve, an unspecified valve failure occurred.Additional information was received that during the implant procedure and following the implant of the valve, an aortic angiography was performed that showed excellent deployment of the transcatheter valve with no paravalvular leak (pvl).However, an echocardiogram was performed that revealed a mean gradient of approximately 30 millimeters of mercury (mm hg).Subsequently, a spacing wire and pigtail catheter were used to cross the valve, and confirmed the patient had an increased gradient.Additionally, fluoroscopy revealed the valve appeared elliptically shaped.Therefore, a post-implant balloon aortic valvuloplasty (bav) was performed using a 24 millimeter (mm) non-medtronic balloon under rapid ventricular pacing to dilate the valve.A repeat aortic angiography was performed that showed no evidence of complications, and repeat echocardiogram showed a mean gradient of 3-6 mm hg.There were no conduction abnormalities, the pacer was removed, and the procedure was completed.Approximately 6 years and 11 months following the implant of this valve, the mechanism of failure was aortic insufficiency of unspecified severity.A computed tomography (ct) scan was performed that also revealed possible thrombus/pannus formation inside of the valve frame.Subsequently, the patient was admitted to the hospital for internal bleeding that was unrelated to the valve.It was planned for the patient to receive a new aortic valve (undetermined as to which valve), and the patient was stabilized.Approximately 2 weeks later, the patient went home to hospice.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Updated data: b1.B2.B3.B5.A second paragraph was added.H1.The original information indicated the event was a reportable malfunction.Additional information indicates that intervention was required.The event is now a reportable serious injury.H6.Additional codes.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVOLUT PRO TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE
Common Device Name
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV
av. paseo del cucapah #10510
tijuana,bc 22210
MX  22210
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV
av. paseo del cucapah #10510
tijuana,bc 22210
MX   22210
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key24866975
Report Number9617601-2026-02442
Device Sequence Number13105542
Product Code NPT
UDI-Device Identifier00763000017835
UDI-Public(01)00763000017835(17)201009
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateCA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P130021
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2019
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/04/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/09/2020
Device Model NumberEVOLUTPRO-29-US
Device Catalogue NumberEVOLUTPRO-29-US
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/09/2026
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/10/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/13/2026
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/04/2026
Date Device Manufactured10/26/2018
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient Age85 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-