|
|
| Catalog Number |
3013SP |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Unspecified Infection (1930)
|
| Date of Event |
01/01/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent a fem pop procedure on an unknown date and absorbable hemostat was used.It was reported by the doctor that he had encountered "4 or 5" infections in his patients over the past 6 months.No exact dates were shared.All of these infections occurred in the groin region of his fem pop procedures.The absorbable hemostat was used in this site.The wounds healed well initially, but infections presented about 1 month post-op.Additional care/treatment required after these infections presented.Additional information was requested.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).D4: udi: as the lot number for the device involved in the event was not provided, the full udi is currently not available.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.1.Please provide the following patient demographic information, if available: age, gender, weight, bmi at the time of index procedure? 2.What are the name and date of index surgical procedure? 3.What were the diagnosis and indication for the index surgical procedure? 4.Please provide any relevant patient history: patient pre-existing medical conditions (i.E.Allergies, history of reactions), all concomitant medications, past medical history, any treatment required for events, dose, frequency, and therapy dates.5.Was there any intraoperative concurrent use of other products? 6.What is the lot number? 7.Did the surgeon use vein or graft material in the procedure? 8.What was the intended use of the surgicel? was it used to address active bleeding or used prophylactically? 9.Where was the surgicel used (on what tissue)? 10.How much surgicel was used during the procedure? 11.Was the surgicel product left in place? was the excess irrigated and removed? 12.Were cultures or sensitivities performed? if yes, what were the results? 13.Please describe what, if any, surgical or medical intervention has been performed? 14.What is physician¿s opinion as to the cause of this event? 15.Was there an alleged deficiency of the surgicel that contributed to the patient¿s post-operative infection? 16.What is the patient¿s current status? 17.What is the users experience w/ surgicel powder and other hemostatic agents? this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Corrected information: h 6.Type of investigation.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: 1.Please provide the following patient demographic information, if available: age, gender, weight, bmi at the time of index procedure? not provided by the hcp 2.What are the name and date of index surgical procedure? fem pop: femoral popliteal bypass 3.What were the diagnosis and indication for the index surgical procedure? blocked femoral artery 4.Please provide any relevant patient history: patient pre-existing medical conditions (i.E.Allergies, history of reactions), all concomitant medications, past medical history, any treatment required for events, dose, frequency, and therapy dates.Unknown 5.Was there any intraoperative concurrent use of other products? unknown 6.What is the lot number? unknown 7.Did the surgeon use vein or graft material in the procedure? unknown 8.What was the intended use of the surgicel? was it used to address active bleeding or used prophylactically? unknown 9.Where was the surgicel used (on what tissue)? unknown 10.How much surgicel was used during the procedure? unknown 11.Was the surgicel product left in place? was the excess irrigated and removed? excess was irrigated and removed per the surgeon 12.Were cultures or sensitivities performed? if yes, what were the results? unknown 13.Please describe what, if any, surgical or medical intervention has been performed? treatment of the infections 14.What is physician¿s opinion as to the cause of this event? not entirely sure, but surgicel powder was the newest change that could correlate with these infections.Complex patients with high number of comorbidities as well though per the surgeon 15.Was there an alleged deficiency of the surgicel that contributed to the patient¿s post-operative infection? unknown 16.What is the patient¿s current status? unknown 17.What is the users experience w/ surgicel powder and other hemostatic agents? began using surgicel powder in september 2025.Has used other surgicel family products for decades this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|