|
Since the device has not been returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: contour deformity.Mentor is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which mentor has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, mentor, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mentor, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If certain information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent breast reconstruction revision with two 425cc mentor memorygel breast implants.Post-operatively, the patient developed left breast capsular contracture (baker grade iv) and right breast contour deformity.There was indentation of the medial aspect of the right breast.As a result, the patient underwent right breast capsulorrhaphy, left breast capsulectomy, breast implant removal and replacement surgery on (b)(6) 2026.The replacement devices were two mentor gel implants.This medwatch form is for the right breast prosthesis.
|