• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DCB00
Medical Device Problem Code Crack (1135)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 02/09/2026
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the preloaded johnson and johnson (jnj) intraocular lens (iol) was implanted into the patient¿s eye.However, the side of the cartridge split during the insertion process.Reportedly, the iol was implanted successfully with no patient issues.No complications such as vitrectomy, sutures, or incision enlargement.Only the cartridge is available for return.The doctor clarified that the cartridge cracked on the side.It is a hairline crack, but she can see it.When the doctor starts to inject the lens that¿s when the side of the cartridge cracks.The cartridge was returned.However, when the complaint preloaded simplicity cartridge was received it showed the cartridge tip was slightly deformed.Because the tip was deformed and it was initially reported that the device had patient contact then this case has been updated to a reportable event and the aware date is the pi completion date april 01, 2026.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information section a2, a3a, a3b, a4, a5, a6, patient information: unknown/not provided.Section d6b, if explanted, give date: not applicable as the device was not explanted.Section d9: device available for evaluation? yes section d9: date returned to manufacturer: section h3: evaluated by manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: the complaint lens was not received.However, the complaint preloaded device simplicity, was visually inspected revealing that the plunger rod was fully advanced.The cartridge tip was observed to be slightly deformed.Ovd was observed inside the cartridge.The lens module and plunger rod were inspected and no issues were identified.Plunger rod advancement was inspected and no issues were identified.No lens was received for evaluation.Based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency, and the reported issue could not be verified.Follow-up was performed.To date, no further information has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key24902551
Report Number3012236936-2026-000099
Device Sequence Number9727519
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474636071
UDI-Public(01)05050474636071(17)281024
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMN
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2026
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 04/16/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberDCB00
Device Catalogue NumberDCB0000195
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/25/2026
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/01/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/16/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/24/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-