|
(b)(4).Date sent: 4/16/2026 d4: batch # 134d97.Investigation summary the product was returned to ethicon endo surgery for evaluation.Visual inspection and functional testing were conducted on the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample determined that the tx30b device was received with no apparent damage and two xr30b reloads (b&c) and two xr30v (c&d) reloads were received along with the device.The reload (b) was received fully fired, the reload (c) was received unfired.In addition, two xr30v (c&d) reloads were received unfired, however the cap was detached and missing, also with the loose pin on both reloads.The device was tested for functionality with the returned reload c) and it fired and formed all the staples as intended.The staple line was complete, and the staples meet the staple form release criteria.The event reported was confirmed and the condition of the reloads received is related to improper use of the reloads.Should be noted that a xr30v (white vascular) reload is only designed to work on a tx30v device.The blue (standard) and green (thick) reloads can be used interchangeably with the appropriately sized instruments.The white (vascular) reload is dedicated to the 30 mm vascular linear stapler and is not interchangeable with the blue and green reloads.Please reference the instruction for use for more information.As part of ethicon endo surgery¿s quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Device history review a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device batch number 134d97, and no non-conformances related to the reported complaint condition were identified.The device/photo upon which this medwatch is based has been received, however, the evaluation is not yet complete.Any further information derived from the evaluation will be submitted in a supplemental 3500a form.Please provide more details about the device quality issue? did the damage occur right out of the packaging, during loading/unloading, or in the operative field? was the plastic portion of the cartridge damaged? or, did the metal pan separate from the device? if yes, did the piece fall in the patient, and if so, was it retrieved? were any staples delivered into the tissue at all? what was the appearance of the deployed staples (b-formed, malformed, goal post/legs straight)? were there staples missing from the staple line (staples not present/visible on any portion of the staple line)? this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|