• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: RESPIRONICS, INC. TRILOGY 100; VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, FACILITY USE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

RESPIRONICS, INC. TRILOGY 100; VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, FACILITY USE Back to Search Results
Model Number 1054655B
Medical Device Problem Codes Mechanical Problem (1384); Failure to Calibrate (2440)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 03/23/2026
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The reported failure of the active exhalation proportional valve test is accommodated in the product risk management file as being linked to hazard with description patient exposure to function / deterioration of function.Complaints for this failure are reviewed via the post market complaint trending and escalation processes to assess for the observed probability levels and compare them with the predicted levels in the risk file for the hazards linked to the failure.As of the date of submission for this report, there is no indication that complaints for the failure in question has led to unacceptable increase in probability levels for the hazardous situations in scope, and therefore no further action will be pursued.Qa continues to monitor complaints for this issue per the cadence in the complaint trending procedures.
 
Event or Problem Description
The manufacturer received information that a trilogy 100 ventilator was returned for service.There was no serious patient harm or injury that occurred or was reported.The device was evaluated at a manufacturer's service center.During testing, the unit failed the active exhalation proportional valve test.Further investigation determined that the active exhalation control module (aecm) required replacement to correct the issue.Additionally, unrelated to the reportable malfunction, the unit failed the nurse call on test step.There was no indication that there was an issue with the nurse call connector.The interface printed circuit assembly (pca) was replaced to address the issue.Additionally, the pollen filter was replaced as part of preventive maintenance.Since scratches were confirmed, the front enclosure overlay was replaced.Following repair, the device successfully passed all required verification procedures, including repair verification testing, alarm testing, battery performance testing, and run-in testing.The device was also cleaned in accordance with standard procedures.The device was confirmed to be operating within specification and was returned to service.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRILOGY 100
Common Device Name
VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, FACILITY USE
Manufacturer (Section D)
RESPIRONICS, INC.
1001 murry ridge lane
murrysville PA
Manufacturer (Section G)
RESPIRONICS, INC.
1001 murry ridge lane
murrysville PA
Manufacturer Contact
melissa rosko
1001 murry ridge lane
murrysville, PA 
7247330200
MDR Report Key24910279
Report Number2518422-2026-010968
Device Sequence Number15909649
Product Code CBK
UDI-Device Identifier00606959052345
UDI-Public(01)00606959052345
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
K083526
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 04/17/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Model Number1054655B
Device Catalogue Number1054655B
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/18/2026
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/23/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/17/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/02/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-