|
Product complaint#: (b)(4).Date sent to the fda: 4/17/2026.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot, and no non-conformance's were identified.Additional information was requested, the following was obtained: were there any patient consequences? no.What is the procedure name? inguinal hernia shouldice tension repair.Please provide the title of external person providing answers to follow-up (e.G.Nurse, surgeon, risk manager).Surgeon: dr.(b)(6).Please provide the status of the device(s) as it has not been received for analysis.If the device has been shipped, please provide the shipment tracking details.Device returned march 25th.The following information was received: additional notes based on surgeon discussion: the shouldice method is a four-layer, tension-based hernia repair technique.Historically, the group has used steel sutures and transitioned to polypropylene sutures approximately three months ago.Suturing technique: the suture is run from the pubic tubercle laterally toward the anterior superior iliac spine (asis) (layer 1) and back, (layer 2) then tied off.The surgeon then performs a second run from the pubic tubercle toward the asis, completing layers 3 and 4.Suture fraying/splitting was observed toward the end of layer three or four.This occurred on the upper half of the suture towards the swage he guessed around 3 inches distal to the swage.He noted no graspers or instruments were applied in this area.Minimal handling of the suture was reported at the site where fraying was observed.H3: investigational summary: the product was returned to eth for evaluation.Visual inspection revealed that one paper lid, one empty winding former and one needle suture piece in two sections were received for analysis.Product code 8412.Upon inspection of the returned sample revealed a split suture with end that appeared cut, likely by a surgical instrument.Body fluids were present on the needle, and the strand showed signs of crushing.Per the conditions of the returned sample the functional test could not be performed.As part of eth quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.
|