|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2026, a 5-4 mm amplatzer piccolo occluder was chosen for a patent ductus arteriosus (pda) closure in a 2.5 kg patient.During procedure, a large jet through and around device showed the device was not large enough for the duct.The duct measured 4.5 at largest and 4.0 and narrowest with 12 mm length.They removed the piccolo occluder and attempted an 8 mm amplatzer vascular plug ii.But the plug impeded the left pulmonary artery (lpa), was not safe and they removed it.A new 3 mm amplatzer duct occluder was chosen.The device sat great, closed the duct and decided to release the device.10-15 min later it was noted that the device was embolized and they spent the next two hours trying to retrieve it but were unsuccessful.During that time, they believe a bifurcation occurred and it caused the patient to code.They tried to revive the patient for 40 min but was unsuccessful.The patient was reported passed away.
|
|
It was reported that on 20 mar 2026, a 5-4mm amplatzer piccolo occluder was chosen for a patent ductus arteriosus (pda) closure in a 2.5kg patient.The pda minimal diameter was 4.2mm, pda diameter at aortic ampulla was 5.5mm and pda length was 12mm.During procedure, a large jet through and around device showed the device was not large enough for the duct.The duct measured 4.5 at largest and 4.0 and narrowest with 12mm length.They removed the piccolo occluder and attempted an 8mm amplatzer vascular plug ii.But the plug impeded the left pulmonary artery (lpa), was not safe and they removed it.A new 3mm amplatzer duct occluder was chosen.The device sat great, closed the duct and decided to release the device.There was 1-3mm leak was detected around the lobe of the device.A10-15 min later it was noted that the device was embolized into pulmonary artery and they spent the next two hours trying to retrieve the device via percutaneous retrieval but was unsuccessful.The cause of embolization/migration was unsure.During that time they believe a perforation occurred and it caused the patient to code.They tried to revive the patient for 40 min but was unsuccessful.The patient was reported passed away.The death was caused by the device embolizing and trying to retrieve.
|
|
An event of device embolization and patient death was reported.Potential causes of embolization may include inadequate sizing, placement of occluder, or patient related factors.Information from the field indicated the during implant they believe a perforation occurred and it caused the patient to code.A returned device assessment could not be performed as the device was not returned for analysis.The device history record was reviewed to ensure that each manufacturing and inspection operation was performed, and the product met all defined manufacturing specifications.There were no complaints associated with any other devices from the lot.Based on the available information, the cause for the reported device embolization could not be determined.It is possible that procedural circumstances contributed to the event.An unexpected medical intervention was a result of case specific circumstances, as the device was snared.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to labeling, design, or manufacturing of the device.Based on medical review: narrative reviewed, no imaging provided.A 3-month-old premature infant (26 weeks' gestation, 2.5 kg) with a symptomatic pda underwent transcatheter closure.Angiography demonstrated a pda measuring 4.2 mm at the narrowest, 5.5 mm at the ampulla, and 12 mm in length.Per the narrative, a 5/4 mm amplatzer piccolo occluder was initially deployed but showed significant residual flow, indicating undersizing, and was removed.An 8 mm avp ii was then attempted but caused left pulmonary artery obstruction and was also removed.A 5/4 mm amplatzer duct occluder i (ado i) was subsequently placed.No imaging was not available, however, per the narrative the device appeared well-positioned with mild residual leak and was released.Approximately 10¿15 minutes post-release, the device embolized to the pulmonary artery without prior positional shift.Percutaneous retrieval was attempted for approximately two hours but was unsuccessful.During retrieval efforts, suspected vascular perforation occurred, with subsequent hemodynamic collapse.Resuscitation was attempted for about 40 minutes without success, and the patient expired.The death is believed to be related to device embolization and complications during retrieval in the setting of a critically ill patient.This appears to be a procedural complication and not a device malfunction.
|