|
|
| Catalog Number |
8522H |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
03/30/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Date sent to the fda: 4/20/2026 this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot, and no non-conformances were identified.The following information was received: the event occurred during the surgery of aortic dissection great vessel, the artificial blood vessel was anastomosed with autologous aorta continuously, the suture was broken from the middle during the tightening of suture after sewing 3 4 stitches.Three intraoperative breakages, which require repeated removal and resewing, directly prolong the blocking time and significantly increase the surgical risk.¿ the suture is not clamped with the instrument all the time, only with the carrying needle ¿ without the felt piece ¿ no change of the assistant on the stage ¿ no change in the brand and model of artificial blood vessel , no change of surgical approach ¿ the surgeon has used this code for many years and has never had such a situation before attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent an unknown procedure on (b)(6) 2026 and suture was used.It was reported that the suture was broken when the surgeon attempted to tie a knot with suture.Total 3 products occurred suture breakage issue.Changed another one to complete the surgery.There were no patient consequences reported.Additional information was requested.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Date sent to the fda: 5/4/2026 this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.H6 component code: g07002 no device problem found additional information: d9, h3, h6 a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot, and no non-conformances were identified.H3 investigational summary: the product was returned to eth for evaluation.Visual inspection revealed that two unopened samples were received for analysis.Product code 8522h.Upon initial inspection of the samples, no external damages were observed on the packets.The packets were opened, and the swage and attachment area were noted as expected.The sutures were dispensed without problems and examined along the strand; no anomalies or issues related to breakage were observed during evaluation.A functional test was performed using instron equipment and the tensile force was above the minimum requirements.As part of eth quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.The event described could not be confirmed.Although no product defect was identified, there may have been other circumstances or issues that occurred during the use of the device that could not be replicated during the laboratory analysis.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|