| Catalog Number |
ES2924 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Deflation Problem (1149)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
03/13/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The additional patient effect referenced in b5 is captured under a separate report.D6a: implant date not known.Best estimate not provided as year not known.The lot number was reviewed for complaint trend, nonconforming report and capa.Devices met specification prior to release.No trends were noted for complaints and there were no nonconforming reports or capas that were confirmed to be associated.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
According to the available information, the implant was removed and replaced with genesis due to malfunction of the prosthesis and likely an infection.It was noted the mechanism to deflate the prosthesis only worked after significant pressure applied and likely purulent fluid (mostly around the pump) found during revision.However, no external sign of infection.This report captures the deflation problem.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
According to the available information, the implant was removed and replaced with genesis due to malfunction of the prosthesis and likely an infection.It was noted the mechanism to deflate the prosthesis only worked after significant pressure applied and likely purulent fluid (mostly around the pump) found during revision.However, no external sign of infection.This report captures the deflation problem.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Titan touch pump, cylinders 1 and 2, and reservoir were received for evaluation.Abrasion was noted on both exhaust tubes and the inlet tube of the pump.Abrasion was noted on both exhaust tubes of the cylinders.No functional abnormalities were noted with cylinder 1 or cylinder 2.No functional abnormalities were noted with the reservoir.The information received indicated the device was difficult to deflate, but because no functional abnormalities were noted with the returned components, the complaint could not be confirmed as reported.A review of the device history record confirmed the devices from this lot met all specifications prior to release.A review of the complaint history database, nonconformances and capas revealed no trends for this lot.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|