| Model Number |
4086 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Unspecified Infection (1930)
|
| Date of Event |
02/12/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Death
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient with this right atrial (ra) lead had exhibited infection and subsequently died.A revision was performed and the lv lead, along with the right ventricular (rv) lead and ra lead were explanted.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.This ra lead was not returned for analysis.No further information was provided.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient with this right atrial (ra) lead had exhibited infection and subsequently died.A revision was performed and the lv lead, along with the right ventricular (rv) lead and ra lead were explanted.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.This ra lead was not returned for analysis.No further information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Investigation summary:
with all available information, boston scientific concludes that unknown factors most probably contributed to the event.If the product is returned to boston scientific for analysis, a report will be provided.Device history record review:
a review of the device history record (dhr) was performed.The review of the dhr identified that there were no process related non-conformances, scrap, or rework performed during the production that could explain the event.The reviews ensure each device meets specification prior to release for use.There is no indication the device manufacturing process contributed to the reported complaint.Device technical analysis:
the complaint device was not returned to boston scientific as it has not been returned for investigation, so product analysis could not be performed.Product record reviews did not identify a potential product quality issue or new patient harm.Labeling review:
review of labeling determined that the complaint situation was listed in the manual.There was no indication in the complaint that the product was not used in accordance to labeling.The manual was unlikely to be the cause of the reported complaint; translation, wording, or graphics does not require further review.Risk review:
a risk review was completed and confirmed that the event of infection was defined in the risk documentation.This event type has been accounted for during product risk analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.Investigation conclusion:
it can be concluded that unknown factors most probably contributed to the event.Laboratory analysis did not identify any lead characteristics that would have caused or contributed to the reported clinical observations.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|