• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA RESILIA VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA RESILIA VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9755RSL29A
Medical Device Problem Code Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Heart Block (4444)
Date of Event 03/16/2026
Type of Reportable Event Death
Event or Problem Description
Per medical record review the patient underwent a successful tavr procedure with a sapien 3 ultra resilia valve, however the patient experienced a left bundle branch block (lbbb), which gradually improved.At the conclusion of the tavr procedure, the patient developed acute respiratory acidosis with severe co2 retention, prompting initiation of bipap.Despite being awake and alert, the patient remained hypotensive with minimal response to intravenous albumin, necessitating transfer to the icu for closer monitoring and management of persistent respiratory and hemodynamic instability.The patient received additional fluid resuscitation in the micu with subsequent stabilization of blood pressure.The patient subsequently passed away.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Per the instructions for use (ifu), arrhythmias and conduction system defects which may or may not require a permanent pacemaker implantation are potential adverse events associated with balloon valvuloplasty, the use of local and/or general anesthesia, bioprosthetic heart valves, and the overall transcatheter valve replacement (tvr) procedure.According to the valve academic research consortium (varc) guidelines, the close anatomical relationship between the aortic valve complex and the branching atrioventricular bundle may explain these complications of the tvr procedure.According to the literature review, and as documented in ew clinical technical summary for complaints, conduction disturbances/ heart block, atrioventricular conduction disturbances after tvr are associated with many patient related and procedural related factors, including pre-operative comorbid status, the degree, and bulkiness of annular calcification, interventricular septal thickness, history of electrocardiogram abnormalities, the depth of prosthesis implantation, and the profile of the implanted prosthesis.Unlike conventional aortic valve replacement (avr), where there may be localized trauma due to decalcification of the annulus and suture placement in the proximity of the atrioventricular (av) node or the bundles, the transcatheter heart valve may cause conduction abnormalities through mechanical impingement of the conduction system by the prosthesis.The mechanisms of the development of heart block after tvr are well documented and described in the literature.It is also documented that pre-existing heart block is common in patients undergoing thv or surgical avr and another 4-6 % will develop postoperative heart block, potentially requiring a permanent pacemaker.In this case, there was no allegation or indication a product malfunction contributed to this adverse event.Investigation results suggest/indicate it is possible that one or more patient/procedural factors identified in the technical summary may have been present and contributed to the event.However, due to limited information provided, a definitive root cause is unable to be determined.A review of edwards lifesciences risk management documentation was performed for this case.The reported event is an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure, additional assessment of this adverse event is not required at this time.The ifu and training manuals have been reviewed and no inadequacies have been identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits monthly, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.As such, neither a product risk assessment, nor corrective or preventative actions are required at this time at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA RESILIA VALVE
Common Device Name
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key24983889
Report Number2015691-2026-14656
Device Sequence Number10505636
Product Code NPT
UDI-Device Identifier00690103215823
UDI-Public(01)00690103215823(17)280318(11)250319
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMO
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P140031
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 04/24/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number9755RSL29A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/30/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/24/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured03/19/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Death;
Patient SexMale
-
-