|
ARTHROCARE CORPORATION COBLATION HALO WAND; ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
72290134 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Overheating of Device (1437)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
04/03/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H3, h6 this complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a product problem associated with a smith+nephew device.The reported problem relates to known risks with the device itself or with its use that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional investigative findings or information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a tonsillectomy procedure, a surgeon experienced an issue with the halo wand.The probe was being used with a werewolf generator (irrigation set to 4, ablation set to hi, and hemostasis set to 1).The wand exhibited abnormal behavior, with excessive smoke emission accompanied by a rise in temperature.The probes was not introduced into the patient¿s mouth, as the issue was identified beforehand.Therefore, it did not seem to be related to suction blockage or tissue residue causing overheating at the electrode.The procedure was performed, using an equivalent sn backup.It is unknown if there was a delay.No further complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|