|
Clinical evaluation performed by medacta medical affairs manager: shortly after primary cemntless tha, the patient feels pain, an arthroscopic psoas release is attempted with no success and finally the stem is revised.The report speaks of a possibly potted stem.From the radiographs supplied, the stem appears to be clearly undersized.We cannot tell what conditions drove an expert surgeon to select a stem so small compared to the size of the femur, so there may have been unspecified factors that contributed to the choice and most probably there was a deceptive feeling of stability at index surgery, but judging from what we can see in the documentation supplied, this stem was undersized.Investigation performed by r&d project manager: from the information reported and the images attached to the complaint it is visible the explanted stem is covered with patient blood.No ha residuals are visible on the stem body.Absorption of ha from the stem body can indicate that metabolic activity was taking place and that, presumably, adequate bone contact was achieved at the time of surgery.The post-op x-ray analysis could possibly provide more insight, such as the evaluation of possible early rotational instability or initial stress-shielding.Some signs of minor damage and scratches are present on the neck of the explanted stem, which is likely due to the revision surgery and not relevant to the reported issue.Based on the analysis completed and information available, it is not possible to identify a root cause of the stem failure.Batch review performed on 07 apr 2026: lot 2314776: (b)(4) items manufactured and released on 29-nov-2023.Expiration date: 2028-nov-13.No anomalies found related to the problem.To date, all items of the same lot have been sold with no similar reported event during the period of review.Root cause:aseptic loosening is a possible literature-described adverse event after primary joint arthroplasties and causes are often unknown.There is no indication that any potential issue with the device may have caused or contributed to the event.From the provided radiographs, the stem appears undersized relative to the femur.While unknown factors may have influenced the surgeon¿s choice and initial stability, the available documentation supports this assessment.
|
|
Revision surgery due to stem loosening (possible potting of the stem) after about 1 year and 7 months from primary surgery.One month after the primary surgery, the patient underwent an arthroscopic tendon release to relieve pain, but the procedure did not produce the desired results.Revision surgery was then planned and the stem was removed, keeping the cup and liner in the patient.A competitor stem and head was then implanted.
|