|
The investigation of this complaint has been completed.The anesthesia system was tested after the event by the field service engineer.The system checkout was performed with the same breathing circuit used at the time of the event and it passed successfully without any deviations.The built in emergency ventilation system was also tested and it was found working properly.No parts were replaced.The system device logs were sent for evaluation.No further information about the patient has been shared by the user facility.The evaluation of the received device logs shows that the last successful system checkout was performed in the evening on the day before the event and thereafter one treatment period was performed.No new system checkout or leakage check were performed prior to start of the actual treatment in which the reported event occurred.The actual treatment was started in manual ventilation in adult patient category.The apl (adjustable pressure limit) was set to sp.With the apl set to sp, the manual breathing bag fills slowly up to 2 cmh2o apl pressure and the patient can breathe spontaneously.The logs show no signs of co2 trace from patient nor any difference in inspired/expired o2 values.This indicates that the sampling line was not connected or that the patient had still not been connected to the system.The inspiratory and expiratory volumes were stable.Approximately two minutes after start, the system was set to automatic ventilation in volume control with the tidal volume set to 500 ml, the respiratory rate set to 12 b/min and peep set to 5 cmh2o.According to the logs the airway pressure and respiratory rate increased, and the expiratory volume decreased.Alarms for respiratory rate high, expiratory minute volume low and leakage, indicating a leakage, were immediately generated.These alarms were followed by alarms for airway pressure high and fio2 low.The logs still not showed any signs of co2 trace from patient nor any difference in inspired/expired o2 values.(after two minutes in volume control, the agc (automatic gas control) was activated, but the system ended the agc and switched back to mgc due to too low etco2 and fico2 difference.) after three minutes in volume control the system was set to manual ventilation.The apl was increased in steps up to 80 cmh2o, the o2 flush was pressed, and then the apl was decreased to 49 cmh2o.The measured inspiratory and expiratory tidal volumes were low.No further changes were performed during the last one and a half minute until the system was shutdown (the built in emergency ventilation was activated).The system was booted one and a half hour later and a successful system checkout was performed.The technical log has no entries during this date, which indicate the absence of technical malfunctions in the system.The evaluation of the logs confirms issues during the treatment.The alarms generated indicate that there was a leakage situation.There is nothing in the logs to indicate that the leakage was caused by a system malfunction at the time of the event.The system tried to deliver flow and pressure according to settings and detected and generated alarms for the current situation.Our conclusion, based on the investigation by the field service engineer and the evaluation of the logs, is that there were no system malfunctions at the time of the event.The root cause of the reported event has not been conclusively determined.
|