• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CONTEGO MEDICAL, INC NEUROGUARD IEP SYSTEM; CAROTID STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CONTEGO MEDICAL, INC NEUROGUARD IEP SYSTEM; CAROTID STENT Back to Search Results
Model Number NG-0740-140-2
Medical Device Problem Code Mechanical Jam (2983)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 04/01/2026
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
Event description it was reported that during an interventional procedure using the neuroguard stent iep system to treat plaque in the left internal carotid artery with an 80% stenosis (lesion length 30mm, vessel diameter 7mm, moderate tortuosity), a non-medtronic (abbott nav 6) embolic protection device was deployed and the neuroguard system was advanced through a 7fr tour guide sheath.The filter was deployed, the stent was deployed, and post-dilation was performed.After the integrated filter of the neuroguard was closed, the physician was unable to remove the neuroguard delivery system because it would not track back over the nav 6 wire.(this is believed to be due to the tour guide sheath collapsing on the neuroguard device and hindering relative movement).As a result, the physician removed everything as a unit.The delivery system was safely removed successfully without injury/intervention and the procedure was completed.No vessel damage reported.Investigation the device was not returned, but information received suggests that the reported situation may have been related to use of a tour guide sheath that broke during the procedure.The lot history does not indicate production related anomalies associated with product lot.There is not a complaint history associated with this report.Suspected primary cause: the reported event is consistent with a kink and or buckle of the tour guide sheath which then collapsed on the neuroguard product.This buckle or kink then did not allow the neuroguard to move with respect to the tour guide.The system then was removed as a unit.Conclusions there was no malfunction identified in the contego neuroguard product.There were no patient complications or additional interventions required as result of the event.The contego investigation does not indicate manufacturing related causes for the reported event.The neuroguard device does not have a complaint history for this type of event.The reported event is consistent with an accessory product kinking or buckling on the neuroguard, causing the entire system to be removed as one unit.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NEUROGUARD IEP SYSTEM
Common Device Name
CAROTID STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CONTEGO MEDICAL, INC
3801 lake boone trail,
suite 100
raleigh
Manufacturer (Section G)
CONTEGO MEDICAL
3801 lake boone trail,
suite 100
raleigh
MDR Report Key25062451
Report Number3011471056-2026-00067
Device Sequence Number15977856
Product Code NIM
UDI-Device Identifier00851616007613
UDI-Public00851616007613
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNC
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P240009
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2026
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Biomedical Engineer
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 05/01/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberNG-0740-140-2
Device Catalogue NumberNG-0740-140-2
Device Lot NumberZ2460872D
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/03/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/03/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-