|
H11: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed, and this lot met all release criteria.Investigational summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.One electronic photo was provided and reviewed and photograph depicts the stylet alone, positioned in the half primed state.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive with respect to the reported failure, as no objective evidence was provided for review.A definitive root cause for the reported failure to fire issue could not be determined based upon the provided information.It is unknown whether patient and/or procedural issues contributed to the reported event.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.Section a through f : the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
On (b)(6) 2025, a patient underwent an ultrasound guided prostate biopsy procedure through normal density tissue using the maxcore instrument.During the procedure, the outer cannula could not be fired.No coaxial needle was used.The procedure was completed by another device.Further re was no reported patient injury.
|