|
The customer reported false reactive alinity i havab igg ii results for multiple patients.The following data was provided: (b)(6) 2026, sid (b)(6) (19-year-old male): initial result on (b)(6) = positive, repeat on another alinity = negative.(b)(6) 2026, sid (b)(6) (33-year-old male): initial result on (b)(6) = positive, repeat = negative, repeat on another alinity = negative.Additionally, the customer noted a shift up in quality controls.A precision study was completed with sid (b)(6) for troubleshooting purposes: (b)(6) = 0.3, (b)(6) = 0.75, (b)(6) = 0.43, (b)(6) = 1.32, (b)(6) = 0.53, (b)(6) = 1.09, (b)(6) = 0.28, (b)(6) = 1.07, (b)(6) = 0.41, (b)(6) = 0.4.A patient comparison study was completed for troubleshooting purposes: sample 1: (b)(6) = 10.8, (b)(6) = 9.61, sample 2: (b)(6) = 0.14, (b)(6) = 0.12, sample 3: (b)(6) = 7.25, (b)(6) = 7.48, sample 4: (b)(6) = 9.08, (b)(6) = 8.53, sample 5: (b)(6) = 8.07, (b)(6) = 8.18, sample 6: (b)(6) = 11.03, (b)(6) = 10.20, sample 7: (b)(6) = 1.26, (b)(6) = 0.73, sample 8: (b)(6) = 0.34, (b)(6) = 0.34, sample 9: (b)(6) = 0.09, (b)(6) = 0.10, sample 10: (b)(6) = 0.21, (b)(6) = 0.27.There was no impact to patient management reported.
|