• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CURONIX LLC FREEDOM PERIPHERAL NERVE STIMULATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CURONIX LLC FREEDOM PERIPHERAL NERVE STIMULATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number STQ4-RCV-B0
Medical Device Problem Code Expulsion (2933)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Erosion (1750)
Date of Event 04/10/2026
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The surgical issue questionnaire was reviewed for potential causes of the reported issue.Potential causes of a fractured neurostimulator include: severe force or bending during implantation or explant, improper surgical technique (incorrect tool, implanting too deep), severe force being applied to the implant (patient fall, accident), and excessive twisting or stretching.A curonix representative conducted a review of sterilization and packaging records for the respective product lot; curonix has confirmed that the product was delivered sterile, validated sterilization parameters were used, and sterile barriers were verified to be intact following packaging.The stimulator is used to treat pain.The cause of the reported issue is unknown.The investigation findings do not lead to a clear conclusion about the cause of the reported issue.Therefore, the conclusion has been selected as unable to determine the root cause.Rates reviewed at the most recent complaint trending meeting do not indicate a significant increase in surgical issues.Surgical issue rates remain acceptably low; thus, a capa is not required at this time.Surgical issue rates will continue to be tracked and trended.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient reported their neurostimulator was broken in half and eroded through their skin.An explant procedure was performed on (b)(6) 2026.The device appeared fractured above the circuitry after the explant procedure.The neurostimulator was removed and there were no broken or fractured pieces left implanted.As of (b)(6) 2026, the patient is healing and doing well.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FREEDOM PERIPHERAL NERVE STIMULATOR
Common Device Name
PERIPHERAL NERVE STIMULATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CURONIX LLC
1310 park central boulevard s.
pompano beach FL 33064
Manufacturer (Section G)
CURONIX LLC
1310 park central boulevard s.
pompano beach FL 33064
Manufacturer Contact
alicia pagliaro
1310 park central boulevard s.
pompano beach, FL 33064
8009655134
MDR Report Key25113748
Report Number3010676138-2026-00072
Device Sequence Number10232030
Product Code GZF
UDI-Device Identifier00850051034413
UDI-Public(01)00850051034413(17)240701
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StatePA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K233162
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2023
Device Explanted Year2026
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 05/07/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date07/01/2024
Device Model NumberSTQ4-RCV-B0
Device Lot NumberSWO220726
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/10/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/07/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured06/15/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age65 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-