| Model Number |
H7493941816220 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Vascular Dissection (3160)
|
| Date of Event |
04/17/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a dissection occurred.The 12 mm x 2.25 mm target lesion was located in the ramus intermedius (ri).The target lesion was pre-treated with a 2.00 mm x 12 mm non-compliant balloon angioplasty catheter resulting in 30% stenosis with timi flow 3.Following predilation, a 2.25 mm x 16 mm synergy xd drug eluting stent was deployed at 14 atm for 20 seconds.Post-deployment, a type c stent edge dissection was observed.The dissection was successfully treated with a 2.25 x 8mm non-boston scientific drug eluting stent.The patient was discharged the same day.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a dissection occurred.The 12 mm x 2.25 mm target lesion was located in the ramus intermedius (ri).The target lesion was pre-treated with a 2.00 mm x 12 mm non-compliant balloon angioplasty catheter resulting in 30% stenosis with timi flow 3.Following predilation, a 2.25 mm x 16 mm synergy xd drug eluting stent was deployed at 14 atm for 20 seconds.Post-deployment, a type c stent edge dissection was observed.The dissection was successfully treated with a 2.25 x 8mm non-boston scientific drug eluting stent.The patient was discharged the same day.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Investigation results:
device analysis findings:
the device was not returned for analysis; therefore, a technical analysis could not be performed.Device history record (dhr) review:
it was confirmed that this device met manufacturing specification prior to distribution and there no manufacturing deviations which could have contributed to the reported event.Labeling review:
review of the instructions for use (ifu) confirmed there was relevant content and sufficient guidance with respect to the circumstances described within this complaint.No updates are required to the ifu as a result of this event.Risk review:
a risk review was performed, and it confirmed that the event was defined in the risk documentation and is recorded accordingly in the product record review (prr) table.This event type has been accounted for during product risk analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.Investigation conclusion:
this investigation is assigned a most probable conclusion code of known inherent risk of device based upon the available information.Based on the medical review conducted for this complaint, the reported clinical event is anticipated per the ifu.The requirement for an additional device was due to procedural factors.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|