• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ESTABLISHMENT LABS S.A. MOTIVA IMPLANTS; SILKSURFACE PLUS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ESTABLISHMENT LABS S.A. MOTIVA IMPLANTS; SILKSURFACE PLUS Back to Search Results
Model Number RSF 275+
Medical Device Problem Code Device Appears to Trigger Rejection (1524)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Capsular Contracture (1761)
Date of Event 04/14/2026
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
France.Allegedly, a patient who underwent a breasts surgery augmentation on (b)(6) 2024, develop a unilateral left side capsular contracture baker grade iv ((b)(6)).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The most common overall indication for reoperation is capsular contracture.(handel, 2006).Breast prostheses are no different from any foreign material implanted into the human body in the sense of triggering a protective immune reaction from the host.This ¿foreign body response¿ (fbr) is universal and ideally removes or otherwise surrounds the ¿irritant material¿ with fibrous tissue to prevent unwanted immune sequelae.A capsule around a breast implant is, therefore, a necessary mechanism of body defense, but if excessive it can lead to pain and deformity of the breast (steiert, et al., 2013).It has been identified several significant risk factors for capsular contracture, including device features (surface, size), surgical factors (periareolar incision, subglandular placement, antibiotic irrigation), the development of hematoma/seroma, and the use of a surgical bra.(calobrace, 2018).Periprosthetic capsules become pathologically active and undergo a ¿constrictive fibrosis¿ due to retraction of the fibrous tissue, which deforms their contents and impairs the aesthetic outcome, manifested by hardening of variable degree and, in advanced cases, by deformity of the breast.(baker et al., 1990).Each patient must receive the establishment labs s.A.¿motiva implants®: information for the patient¿ during her surgical consultation, it is the surgeons´ responsibility to ensure that the patient completely understands the information regarding the risks, benefits, and recommendations associated with silicone gel-filled breast implant surgery, as well as the complications typical of any type of surgery.This document is available in motiva® website: http://motivaimplants.Com/information-for-the-patient.Some analysis have revealed that the pocket plays a significant role in developing seroma, patients with submammary pocket developed seroma in higher rates when compared with patients with submuscular pocket.Submammary pocket increases the odds of developing seroma by 7.5 times.(sforza, et al.2017) the instructions for use in the directions for use were reviewed, to determinate if there are indications that ensure the prevention and good handling of the product.For this event, it is considered that the information is suitable for the section of surgical precautions as follows: ¿capsular contracture occurs when the capsule tightens and squeezes the implant.This can cause the implant to turn rigid (from slightly firm to quite hard) and the firmest ones can cause varying degrees of discomfort, pain, and palpability.In addition to the firmness, capsular contracture can result in a deformed breast, visible surface wrinkling and/or displacement of the implant.Detection of breast cancer by mammography may also be a more difficult.Capsular contracture may be more common following infection, hematoma, and seroma, and the chance of it happening may increase over time.Capsular contracture is a risk factor for implant rupture, and it is the most common reason for reoperation in augmentation and reconstruction patients.Patients should also be advised that additional surgery might be needed in cases where pain and/or firmness are severe (baker grades iii or iv) and that capsular contracture may happen again after additional surgeries.Correction of capsular contracture may require surgical removal or release of the capsule, or removal and possible replacement of the implant itself¿.In addition, a review of the device history record was conducted, and it was concluded that there were no deviations in the manufacturing process of this device that would have caused or contributed to this incident.When the investigation process is completed, the applicable findings will be included in a supplemental.At establishment labs, we are committed to patient safety and continually evaluate the performance of our devices through post market surveillance of reported complaints & adverse events.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
1.Overview the quality department (pms) received a complaint involving a motiva® device.Further details are provided in the cq ¿details¿ section.2.General information: device involvement: a causal relationship between the reported event and the device has been established.Event characterization: the event was classified as a capsular contracture.3.Clinical confirmation: upon thorough evaluation of the submitted clinical documentation and supporting evidence, the reported case was confirmed meeting the requirements for a capsular contracture, classified as baker grade iii/iv.This classification indicates moderate to severe contracture, characterized by firmness, distortion, and potential patient discomfort or pain.Root cause analysis capsular contracture is a well-documented complication inherent to breast implant surgery.Based on the analysis of the available data, including clinical findings and product traceability records, there is no evidence indicating a causal link between this specific case and any product-related factors, including raw materials or manufacturing processes.The etiology of capsular contracture is recognized as multifactorial, with potential contributing elements including postoperative patient-specific biological responses, and surgical technique.Given the absence of manufacturing deviations or anomalies, and in line with current clinical literature, the event is considered not attributable to a defect in the device or its production.4.Dfu and labeling evaluation the event is a known, well-documented complication associated with silicone breast implants.It is clearly addressed in the product¿s directions for use (dfu), which states: "a capsular contracture pertains to hypertrophic scar tissue investing in a foreign body or surgically implanted device, compromising the aesthetic outcome, resulting in pain, breast deformity, and often necessitating further operations.Detection of breast cancer by mammography may also be challenging.Capsular contracture may be more common following infection, hematoma and seroma, and the chance of it happening may increase over time.Capsular contracture occurs more commonly in patients undergoing revision surgery than in patients undergoing primary implantation surgery.Capsular contracture is the most common complication following implant- based breast surgery and is one of the most common reasons for reoperation" capsular contracture is graded into 4 levels depending on its severity.Baker grade i: the breast is normally soft and looks natural; baker grade ii: the breast is a little fi rm but looks normal; baker grade iii: the breast is firm and looks abnormal; baker grade iv: the breast is hard, painful, and looks abnormal.Patients should also be advised that additional surgery might be needed in cases where pain and/or firmness are severe (baker grades iii or iv) and that capsular contracture may happen again after additional surgeries.Correction of capsular contracture may require surgical removal or release of the capsule, or removal and possible replacement of the implant itself.Capsular contracture: normally, capsules of collagen fibers form as an immune response around a foreign body, such as a breast implant, tending to isolate it.Capsular contracture occurs when the capsule tightens and squeezes the implant.This can cause the implant to turn rigid (from slightly firm to quite hard) and the firmest ones can cause varying degrees of discomfort, pain and palpability.In addition to the firmness, capsular contracture can result in a deformed breast, visible surface wrinkling and/or displacement of the implant.Detection of breast cancer by mammography may also be more difficult.Capsular contracture may be more common following infection, hematoma, and seroma, and the chance of it happening may increase over time.Capsular contracture occurs more commonly in patients undergoing revision surgery than in patients undergoing primary implantation surgery.Capsular contracture is a risk factor for implant rupture, and it is the most common reason for reoperation in augmentation and reconstruction patients.¿ the dfu also emphasizes the responsibility of the surgeon to fully inform the patient of potential risks and complications during the pre-operative consultation.Patients are provided with the document ¿motiva implants®: information for the patient,¿ accessible at ifu.Motiva.Health.Literature reference: the aetiology of capsular contracture is multifactorial and consisting of patient, type of surgery, prosthetic material used, the implant pocket placement, the incision type and the duration of follow-ups (liu et al., 2015) (headon, kasem & mokbel, 2015).Capsular contracture is a risk associated with breast surgery (handel, 2006) and there is no evidence to suggest a link between this particular implant and/or its manufacturing process and a higher risk of capsular contracture occurrence.The cause of capsular contracture is multifactorial (calobrace, 2018), and we cannot conclude that the reported event was caused by the manufacturing process and/or the product itself.5.Device history record (dhr) review a comprehensive review of the device history record (dhr) for the affected lot was completed.No deviations, non-conformances, or anomalies were identified during manufacturing.All raw materials and process parameters conformed to specified quality requirements.6.Trend and signal monitoring the event has been evaluated as part of ongoing trend analysis activities within the pms program.Per the current complaint data report: no adverse or unexpected trends related to the reported event have been identified.No further corrective or preventive actions are required at this time.Establishment labs will continue to monitor for similar events as part of routine pms surveillance.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MOTIVA IMPLANTS
Common Device Name
SILKSURFACE PLUS
Manufacturer (Section D)
ESTABLISHMENT LABS S.A.
building b-25, coyol free zone
alajuela,alajuela
Manufacturer (Section G)
ESTABLISHMENT LABS S.A.
building b-25, coyol free zone
alajuela,alajuela
Manufacturer Contact
susana hidalgo
building b-25, coyol free zone
alajuela,alajuela 
8003554164
MDR Report Key25161974
Report Number3012883202-2026-02335
Device Sequence Number10737748
Product Code FTR
UDI-Device Identifier07445161002068
UDI-Public(01)07445161002068(11)220413(17)270413
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUS
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2024
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/13/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberRSF 275+
Device Catalogue NumberRSF-275+
Device Lot Number22040783
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/29/2026
Supplement Date Received by ManufacturerNot provided
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/13/2026
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/15/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured04/13/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-