| Model Number |
5101 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Discomfort (2330)
|
| Date of Event |
01/01/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported the patient with this neurostimulator and tined lead had an explant.The patient reported they had the explant surgery last year due to discomfort and inefficacy.The patient said they could not remember the exact date of the explant, only stated it happened sometime last year.The patient fully recovered and is no longer in discomfort.The patient is exploring other treatment options.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Block d10: model number/catalog number: 1201.Serial number: (b)(6).Batch/lot number: al1s941022.Model/catalog description: tined lead.Unique identifier (udi) #: (b)(4).Block g4: premarket / 510(k) #: additional premarket / 510(k) # p190006.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported the patient with this neurostimulator and tined lead had an explant.The patient reported they had the explant surgery last year due to discomfort and inefficacy.The patient said they could not remember the exact date of the explant, only stated it happened sometime last year.The patient fully recovered and is no longer in discomfort.The patient is exploring other treatment options.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Block d2b:
product code: additional product code qon
block d10:
model number/catalog number: 1201
serial number: (b)(6)
batch/lot number: al1s941022
model/catalog description: tined lead
unique identifier (udi) #: (b)(4).Block g4:
premarket / 510(k) #: additional premarket / 510(k) # p190006
block h11:
investigation details:
the device was not returned for analysis; therefore, a technical analysis could not be performed.Good faith effort attempts were made to try and retrieve the device; however, the device was disposed.It was confirmed the device met manufacturing specification prior to distribution and there were no manufacturing deviations which could have contributed to the reported event.Review of the instructions for use (ifu) confirmed there was relevant content and sufficient guidance with respect to the circumstances described within this complaint.No updates are required to the ifu as a result of this event.A risk review was completed and confirmed that the event of discomfort was defined in the product risk documentation.This event type has been accounted for during analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.Based on a thorough review of the reported complaint, boston scientific has assigned an investigation conclusion code of known inherent risk of device.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|