|
Section a2, a3a, a3b, a4, a5, a6, patient information: unknown/not provided.Section b3, date of event: the exact date is unknown.The best estimate is between the implant and explant dates which are (b)(6) 2026.Section h3, device evaluated by manufacturer: the device has not been returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record and complaint trending will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempt was made to obtain the missing information.However, to date, it has not been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
|
It was reported that the johnson and johnson (jnj) intraocular lens (iol) was implanted into the patient¿s eye.The patient experienced an unexpected post-operative refraction.Consequently, the iol explanted.The product was cut into 4 pieces before removal.The doctor asked johnson and johnson for assistance in calculating the power.There were no other complications reported.Follow-up was performed to get more details, however no further information is available.
|
|
Additional information.Section d9: device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9: date returned to manufacturer: may 21, 2026.Section h3: evaluated by manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation:
the complaint lens was received.The lens was visually inspected revealing that it was cut into four pieces.No further issues were identified.During the product evaluation it was confirmed that the physical characteristics of the lens matched a zcu model lens.Based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.Conclusion:
as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency, and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|