|
It was reported that the infuser failed to heat the blood being infused, resulting in a delay in therapy while a second unit was set up.The staff continued to infuse the blood, due to massive blood transfusion needed.This was during a code situation they gained rosc on the patient.Later the patient was transitioned to comfort care and passed away.This event occurred during infusion.Based on the currently available complaint narrative, a patient death occurred in the setting of a code event with reported massive blood transfusion, where it was alleged that the level 1® fast flow fluid warmer failed to heat blood during infusion, resulting in a delay in therapy while a second unit was set up; rosc was reportedly achieved, the patient was later transitioned to comfort care, and subsequently died.The patient¿s medical history and key clinical context are not provided, including the underlying diagnosis and clinical circumstances that precipitated the code event, the indication for and magnitude of the massive transfusion requirement, objective temperature data (patient core temperature and/or device outlet temperature), transfusion volumes and rates, the duration of any period of reduced/absent warming, and the clinical rationale for the subsequent transition to comfort care.In the absence of these details, a plausible device related mechanism linking the alleged warming failure/delay to the patient¿s outcome cannot be established from the information currently available.Notably, the customer response indicated the delay did not contribute to patient harm.Therefore, a causal relationship between the device and the reported death cannot be confirmed or excluded at this time, and the clinical causality assessment is indeterminate pending investigation and receipt of additional clinical information and objective device evaluation results.Should further relevant data become available, this medical assessment may be updated.The date of death is unknown, and the event date has been used.
|