|
|
| Catalog Number |
011504 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Laceration(s) (1946)
|
| Date of Event |
04/23/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that "surgeon was using the deflux gel syringe and when she tried to start pushing the contents out, she was met with more resistance than normal, and the syringe completely shattered, resulting in a laceration on her finger.The surgeon uses this product frequently and has never had issues with it, so she believes it might be a faulty lot." additional information received on april 28, 2026, indicated that "the patient was under anesthesia, and the procedure could proceed without awaking the patient with another syringe.The deflux metal needle was used.The indication was vur in a child.No injuries reported." the photograph provided by the customer shows a superficial laceration on the finger.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that "surgeon was using the deflux gel syringe and when she tried to start pushing the contents out, she was met with more resistance than normal, and the syringe completely shattered, resulting in a laceration on her finger.The surgeon uses this product frequently and has never had issues with it, so she believes it might be a faulty lot."
additional information received on april 28, 2026, indicated that "the patient was under anesthesia, and the procedure could proceed without awaking the patient with another syringe.The deflux metal needle was used.The indication was vur in a child.No injuries reported." the photograph provided by the customer shows a superficial laceration on the finger.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Complaint verification testing could not be performed as no sample was returned for analysis.A device history record review was performed, and no relevant findings were identified.Picture: visual inspection has been performed of provided picture in terms of overall appearance.Two images were reviewed.The first image shows a finger with a cut, indicating that the healthcare professional (hcp) may have been injured by the glass syringe.The second image shows a box with the reported lot number.However, no image of the damaged (broken flange) syringe is provided.The images do not allow verification of the complaint, as the defective syringe is not shown.Without the device to evaluate the complaint could not be confirmed and the probable cause could not be determined from the available information.If the sample becomes available at a later date a follow-up report will be submitted with investigation results.Palette life sciences will continue to monitor and trend for reports of this nature.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|