| Model Number |
E200-29M |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Dyspnea (1816); Movement Disorder (4412)
|
| Date of Event |
04/08/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Clinical information: (b)(4) sh device registry, patient site id: (b)(6).It was reported that on 08 apr 26, a 29mm epic plus mitral valve was implanted in the patient.After the implant, the patient presented with dyspnea.A chest x-ray showed elevation of the right hemidiaphragm consistent with right hemidiaphragmatic paresis ( secondary to injury of the right phrenic nerve during sternal re-opening).A non invasive mechanical ventilation (nimv) was initiated with a good response.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Clinical information: (b)(6)- sh device registry, patient site id: site id- (b)(6).It was reported that on (b)(6) 2026, a 29mm epic plus mitral valve was implanted in the patient.After the implant, the patient presented with dyspnea.A chest x-ray showed elevation of the right hemidiaphragm consistent with right hemidiaphragmatic paresis ( secondary to injury of the right phrenic nerve during sternal re-opening).A non invasive mechanical ventilation (nimv) was initiated with a good response.The patient was discharged on postoperative day +15 in very good clinical condition.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
An event for patient effects of dyspnea, movement disorder was reported.A returned device assessment could not be performed as the device was not returned for analysis.The device history record was reviewed to ensure that each manufacturing and inspection operation was performed, and the product met all defined manufacturing specifications.Based on the available information, the cause of the reported patient effects could not be conclusively determined.It is possible that procedural conditions contributed to the reported incidents; however, this cannot be confirmed.The reported unexpected medical interventions was a result of case-specific circumstances.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to labeling design or manufacturing of the device.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|