|
(b)(4) date sent: 5/23/2026 d4: batch # 432d74.Investigation summary the product was returned to ees for evaluation.Visual inspection and functional testing were conducted on the returned device.Visual analysis determined that the cs40g device was received with no apparent damage and with a cr40g reload loaded.The reload was received with some staples protruding with bent legs, the washer uncut, the knife recessed below the reload deck, and the drivers partially advanced.The reload was not properly loaded in the device, as the retaining pin was not connected to the coupler and pushrod, indicating the reload was removed and reinserted incorrectly and/or incompletely after the retainer was removed.The device was tested for functionality with a test reload and fired, forming all staples and cutting as intended.The cut line and staple line were completed and the staples met the staple form release criteria.The device opened and closed without any difficulties.The condition of the reload is consistent with the device being partially activated, resulting in the lockout being engaged when the device was reopened.If the reload is removed from the device after the staple retainer has been removed, it cannot be reloaded into the device.Do not fire the instrument unless the closure trigger is properly latched against the handle, and the firing trigger must be pulled back completely against the closure trigger to properly fire the instrument.If the firing sequence is not complete, staples may be deployed without cutting the washer and forming the staples.Please reference the instructions for use for additional information and for the complete guide to loading and reloading the instrument.As part of ees quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Device history review a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device batch number 432d74, and no non-conformances were identified.Additional information was requested and the following was obtained: 1.If the device stapled/fired, was the staple line complete? - the device did not fire the staples 2.If the device was stapled, was the shape of the staples (b-formation, irregular, unformed)?- the device did not fire the staples 3.Did the device cut? - the device did not work at all 4.If the device cut/fired, was the cut line complete? - the device did not work at all 5.Could you please clarify if there were any patient consequences? - na 6.Could you please clarify if there were any change in the post-operative care of the patient as a result of the event? - na note: the device did not deploy the staple pins, nor did it cut.Hence the surgeons used new gun.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|