• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM RED 68 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM RED 68 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RED68KIT
Medical Device Problem Code Fracture (1260)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 04/25/2026
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the middle cerebral artery (mca) using a penumbra system red 68 reperfusion catheter (red68), penumbra system red 43 reperfusion catheter (red43), and a neuron max 6f 088 long sheath (neuron max).The physician advanced the red68 and red43 over the guidewire and into the target location.The red43 and guidewire were removed.The physician began aspiration using the red68 while applying a syringe vacuum to the side port of the rotating hemostasis valve (rhv).While removing the red68 under aspiration, the physician noticed that multiple locations on the distal segment of the red68 were fractured within the rhv.The physician was able to successfully remove the entire fractured red68 and rhv together.It was reported that aspiration was performed to clear the lumen of the neuron max.A follow up angiography was performed that revealed the vessel was opened.The procedure was completed at this point.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned penumbra system red 68 reperfusion catheter (red68) confirmed fractures on the catheter.Due to the lack of torquing or stretching at the fractured locations, this was likely the result of a kink.If the red68 is manipulated at an angle or against resistance during use, the catheter may become kinked and subsequently fracture.Based on the reported event, the root cause could not be determined.Evaluation revealed kinks near the fracture location due to the same manipulation during use.Further evaluation revealed an additional kink near the hub.This damage was incidental to the complaint and may have occurred during packaging of the device for return.Penumbra catheters are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SYSTEM RED 68 REPERFUSION CATHETER
Common Device Name
NRY
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer (Section G)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica menezes
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key25299753
Report Number3005168196-2026-00174
Device Sequence Number9319086
Product Code NRY
UDI-Device Identifier00815948024113
UDI-Public00815948024113
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateWA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K211411
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 05/27/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberRED68KIT
Device Lot NumberH00008701
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/30/2026
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/27/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/27/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/14/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-