• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM RED 68 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM RED 68 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RED68KIT
Medical Device Problem Code Fracture (1260)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 04/25/2026
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned penumbra system red 68 reperfusion catheter (red68) confirmed that the catheter was fractured.No signs of torquing or stretching at the fractured location indicate that the fracture was likely due to a kink.If the red68 is advanced against resistance during use, damage such as a kink may occur.Subsequent retraction of the kinked red68 against resistance likely contributed to the subsequent fracture.The reported tortuous anatomy may have contributed to resistance during the procedure.Further evaluation of the red68 revealed kinks along the distal length.This damage may have occurred during advancement against resistance or handling of device post-procedure.Penumbra catheters are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the m1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (mca) using a penumbra system red 68 reperfusion catheter (red68), a penumbra system red 43 reperfusion catheter (red43), and a neuron max 6f 088 long sheath (neuron max).It was reported that the patient's anatomy was tortuous.The physician experienced resistance while advancing the red68 and the red43 to the target location, so the red68 and red43 were removed together.After removal, the red68 was noticed to be fractured at the distal end.While removing the red43 from the red68 on the back table, the red68 unraveled at the fractured location.The procedure was completed with a penumbra system red 62 reperfusion catheter (red62) and the same red43.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SYSTEM RED 68 REPERFUSION CATHETER
Common Device Name
NRY
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer (Section G)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica menezes
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key25300375
Report Number3005168196-2026-00177
Device Sequence Number9422671
Product Code NRY
UDI-Device Identifier00815948024113
UDI-Public00815948024113
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNE
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K211411
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 05/27/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberRED68KIT
Device Lot NumberC00020038
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/14/2026
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/28/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/27/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/14/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexFemale
-
-