| Model Number |
DB-1432 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Battery Problem (2885); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
05/03/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device was not returned for analysis; therefore, a technical analysis could not be performed.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed.The review of the dhr identified that there were no process related non-conformances, scrap, or rework performed during the production that could explain the event.The reviews ensure each device meets specification prior to release for use.There is no indication the device manufacturing process contributed to the reported complaint.Based on a thorough review of the reported complaint, boston scientific has assigned an investigation conclusion code of cause not established.B3: approximated based on the date the manufacturer became aware of the event.D2b: additional pro code selection that applies to the indication of this device: nhl, pjs.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that this deep brain stimulation (dbs) patient underwent the replacement of the implantable pulse generator (ipg) due to an unknown reason.The location of the device is unknown.No additional information is available at this time.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that this deep brain stimulation (dbs) patient underwent the replacement of the implantable pulse generator (ipg) due to an unknown reason.The location of the device is unknown.No additional information is available at this time.Additional information indicates that the ipg was replaced due to end of service (eos).The sales representative was informed on may 3rd.This was a standard replacement of the primary cell due to high energy usage.The patient tolerated the procedure well, with no reported complications or issues.Per hospital policy, the ipg was retained by the facility.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device was not returned for analysis; therefore, a technical analysis could not be performed.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed.The review of the dhr identified that there were no process related non-conformances, scrap, or rework performed during the production that could explain the event.The reviews ensure each device meets specification prior to release for use.There is no indication the device manufacturing process contributed to the reported complaint.A labeling review did not reveal any anomalies and states that the following may be potential risks associated with its use: when the implanted non rechargeable stimulator is nearing the end of its battery life, the stimulator will enter the elective replacement mode.The elective replacement indicator (eri) will appear.The stimulator must be replaced to continue receiving stimulation.Based on a thorough review of the reported complaint, boston scientific has assigned an investigation conclusion code of cause not established.B3: approximated based on the date the manufacturer became aware of the event.D2b: additional pro code selection that applies to the indication of this device: nhl, pjs.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|