| Model Number |
L101 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Premature Discharge of Battery (1057); Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535); High Capture Threshold (3266)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
05/05/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This product investigation is still in progress.This report will be updated when product investigation is complete.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a routine visit; this pacemaker system was found to be operating in safety mode.Technical services (ts) was contacted for consult review.Ts reviewed provided stored reports and confirmed device to be in safety mode.Ts also noted that a prior consult report from (b)(6) 2024 showed right ventricular automatic threshold (rvat) was detected as greater than programmed amplitude or suspended.Further review showed high pacing thresholds on the right ventricular (rv) lead.Ts advised that changeout urgency should be driven by potential symptoms to current settings and increase in power consumption due to increase in pacing output voltage.Subsequently, additional information was provided that reported that a replacement procedure was performed.The pacemaker was explanted due to safety mode and premature battery depletion (pbd) and replaced with a new device successfully.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a routine visit, this pacemaker system was found to be operating in safety mode.Technical services (ts) was contacted for consult review.Ts reviewed provided stored reports and confirmed device to be in safety mode.Ts also noted that a prior consult report from (b)(6) 2024 showed right ventricular automatic threshold (rvat) was detected as greater than programmed amplitude or suspended.Further review showed high pacing thresholds on the right ventricular (rv) lead.Ts advised that changeout urgency should be driven by potential symptoms to current settings and increase in power consumption due to increase in pacing output voltage.Subsequently, additional information was provided that reported that a replacement procedure was performed.The pacemaker was explanted due to safety mode and premature battery depletion (pbd) and replaced with a new device successfully.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device technical analysis:
this product has not been returned to boston scientific, and as a result, laboratory analysis could not be conducted.Device history record review:
a review of the device history record (dhr) was performed.The review of the dhr identified that there were no process related non-conformances, scrap, or rework performed during the production that could explain the event.The reviews ensure each device meets specification prior to release for use.There is no indication the device manufacturing process contributed to the reported complaint.Labeling review:
review of labeling determined that the complaint situation was listed in the manual.There was no indication in the complaint that the product was not used in accordance with labeling.The manual was unlikely to be the cause of the reported complaint; translation, wording, or graphics does not require further review.Risk assessment:
a risk review was completed and confirmed that the event of device displays error message was defined in the risk documentation.This event type has been accounted for during product risk analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.Investigation conclusion:
based on a thorough review of the reported complaint, boston scientific has assigned an investigation conclusion code of cause not established.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|