|
A nurse reported that during an intraocular lens (iol) implantation procedure, it was observed that the lens was damage by the injector, and the crack was noticed after the lens was implanted.The crack was located where the injector touched the lens.The lens was subsequently removed during initial procedure and the surgery was completed on the same day.Additional information was requested, but no further information was available.
|
|
Additional information was provided in d.9., h.3., h.6., and h.11.One opened company handpiece was returned for evaluation for the report of a damaged lens.A visual inspection of the iol (intra ocular lens) handpiece injector was performed and was found to be conforming.A dimensional inspection for plunger position height was performed and was found conforming.A functional thread to barrel engagement check was performed and was found to be conforming.A review of the device history record traceable to the reported lot number indicates that the reported product was processed and released according to the reported product¿s acceptance criteria.The investigation conducted a non-conformance review of the reported lot number.No deviations were identified and all corresponding production release specifications defined in the device master record were met.One photo attached to the parent complaint was reviewed by an investigation site.The photo shows a damaged implanted lens.The reported issue was confirmed; however, how and when the damage occurred cannot be determined from the photo review only.Not company manufacturing related - based on the evaluation of the information and materials received, the investigation concluded that the root cause of the reported event is not determined as the returned sample conformed to all visual, dimensional and functional testing.Not company manufacturing related: not warranted - no further investigation or manufacturing actions are warranted at this time due to that the returned sample met specifications.All company handpiece injectors are 100% inspected at the end of the manufacturing process to ensure visual quality requirements, the thread engagement is acceptable, and the correct plunger height is present before release of the product.Receipt of additional relevant information or supporting materials will prompt a re-evaluation of the complaint investigation.Data for all company products is reviewed monthly to monitor adverse trends.During the last review, no adverse trends were observed for the reported product and event combination.Quality assurance has reviewed this complaint and will continue to monitor data for evidence of adverse trends and take further action, as appropriate.No further action warranted at this time.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).H.10 reflects all related report numbers associated with this product event that have been submitted at this time.
|