|
(b)(4).Date sent: 6/03/2026 d4: batch #556d98 investigation summary: the product was returned for evaluation.Visual inspection and functional testing were conducted on the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample determined that one ech60l device was returned with no visual non-conformances and without a reload present.In addition, a reload pan was found lodged inside the channel.The pan was removed from the channel.The manual override door was out of position; the override lever was up which denotes that the knife was manually returned to home position.The bailout system was reset and then, it was tested for functionality in the straight position with a test reload and achieved its complete firing sequence without any difficulties.The staple line and cut line were complete and the staples met the staple release criteria.It is possible that handling by the customer could dislodge the pan.Dislodgement as a result of the removal of the reload from the device is the most likely scenario.The device event log was reviewed.The log indicates that articulation was attempted while the device was closed.Articulation function is blocked when the device is closed to prevent inadvertent patient injury.When the home button is pressed while the jaws are closed the device will attempt to retract the knife.When any of the other articulation buttons are pressed while the jaws are closed the device will provide haptic feedback indicating that articulation function is blocked.As part of ees quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot/batch number, a97y1m, and no non-conformances were identified.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device batch number 556d98, and no non-conformances were identified.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
It was reported that during a gastric sleeve procedure, the stapler reload was successfully removed.When staff attempted to load a new reload, the reload could not be advanced or slid into the stapler properly, preventing successful reloading of the device.There was no patient consequence nor surgical delay reported.No additional information provided.
|