• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 MESH - VENTRALEX; SURGICAL MESH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 MESH - VENTRALEX; SURGICAL MESH Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 0010303
Medical Device Problem Code Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Adhesion(s) (1695); Hernia (2240)
Date of Event 09/24/2018
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-apr-2008) is considered to be a best estimate.This emdr represents the ventralex mesh (device 2).Additional supplemental emdrs were submitted to represent the ventralex mesh (device 1) and ventralight st using echo ps mesh (device 3).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
Per information provided: (b)(6) 2008 - patient was diagnosed with ventral epigastric hernia and umbilical hernia thereby underwent open repair with the implant of ventralex meshes.Per op notes, "a supraumbilical hernia defect was present.The umbilical hernia was also noted.The umbilical defect was closed with a small ventralex patch (device 1) which was secured to the fascia using sutures.The larger supraumbilical defect was closed with a large ventralex mesh (device 2) which was placed in subfascial pocket using sutures." (b)(6) 2018 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent incisional hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with the implant of ventralight st mesh using echo ps (device 3).Per op notes, "there were significant adhesions of omentum up to the anterior abdominal wall and the previously placed mesh (device 1, 2) was taken down.Two small hernias were identified in the periumbilical area.An additional hernia was identified in the lower abdomen just to the left of the midline.A piece of ventralight st mesh using echo ps (device 3) was placed around the defect and secured around periphery using sorbafix tacks.".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MESH - VENTRALEX
Common Device Name
SURGICAL MESH
Manufacturer (Section D)
DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643
100 crossings blvd.
warwick RI 02886
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD SHANNON LIMITED -3005636544
san geronimo industrial park
lot #1, road #3, km 79.7
humacao PR 00791
Manufacturer Contact
andrew topoulos
100 crossings blvd.
warwick, RI 02886
8005566756
MDR Report Key25390392
Report Number1213643-2026-00712
Device Sequence Number5191536
Product Code FTL
UDI-Device Identifier00801741016486
UDI-Public(01)00801741016486(17)130628(10)HUSD1714
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateAL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K132441
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2008
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Consumer
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 06/02/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/28/2013
Device Catalogue Number0010303
Device Lot NumberHUSD1714
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/13/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/04/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured04/15/2008
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age44 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-