|
(b)(4).Date sent: 6/8/2026 b3: exact event date unk, entered 1/1/2026 as only the year was provided.D4: batch # 790d79.Investigation summary the product was returned to ees for evaluation.Visual inspection and functional testing were conducted on the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample determined that the ntlc75 device was received with no apparent damage and with a reload present.The reload had the proximal 7 drivers up without staples, the remaining drivers down with staples present, and with the cartridge deck damaged.The returned reload had the swing tab in the locked position.In addition, the reload returned with its opened packaging.The device was tested for functionality with a test reload and it fired, cut, and formed all staples as intended.The staple line and cut line were complete and the staples meet the staple form release criteria.The reload was reset and the device was tested for functionality with the returned reload and it fired, cut, and formed all the remaining staples as intended.The damage to the reload is consistent with the device being clamped over a hard object.To mitigate the potential for staples getting into the reload and interfering with the knife during device firing, prior to reloading the device, clean in sterile solution and then wipe the anvil and reload channel to clean any formed but unused staples from the device.Additionally, proper care should be taken when placing the device on the tissue to be stapled, to ensure that no hard obstruction such as a clip is included with the tissue inside the jaws.The event reported was confirmed and it is related to improper use of the device.It should be noted that the cartridge reload is designed to lockout, as a safety feature, if any staples have been fired from the cartridge reload.In addition, failure to complete the stroke may result in incomplete staple line.Please reference the instruction for use for more information.As part of ees quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Device history review a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device batch number 790d79, and no non-conformances were identified.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
It was reported that, during open bowel obstruction surgery, when firing was attempted, the knife moved forward slightly but did not move forward further after that.The doctor, attempted to fire, but the knife device did not operate at all.The device was replaced with echelon to complete the case.There were no adverse consequences to the patient.No further information is available.
|