• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DXR00V
Medical Device Problem Code Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a4: weight: unknown/not provided.Section a5: ethnicity: unknown/not provided.Section a6: race: unknown/not provided.Section b3: date of event: unknown; requested but not provided.The best estimate date is prior to on (b)(6) 2026 [alert date].Section d6a: if implanted, give date: unknown/not provided; the extent of patient contact is unknown, however there is no indication that the lens was fully implanted.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: unknown/not provided; the extent of patient contact is unknown, however there is no indication that the lens was fully implanted, therefore, not explanted.The product was received for evaluation.Device evaluation: visual inspection revealed that the cleaned lens was cut in half with damage on the surface.One haptic was also detached.No further issues were identified.The complaint issue "unspecified/other w/ patient involvement" was not identified during product evaluation.The other observed issues during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to a manufacturing or design issue.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing records for the product were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specification.A search of complaints related to this production order (po) was performed.The search revealed that no similar complaints for this po number have been received.Conclusion: based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.No product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.The following fields were updated accordingly: section d9: device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9: date returned to manufacturer: apr 23, 2026.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a preloaded extended depth of focus intraocular lens (iol) did not perform as expected.The event was observed during implantation/application.No further information was provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key25487844
Report Number3012236936-2026-000150
Device Sequence Number10439110
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474761810
UDI-Public(01)05050474761810(17)250422
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateFL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 06/12/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/22/2025
Device Model NumberDXR00V
Device Catalogue NumberDXR00VU210
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/23/2026
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/14/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/12/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/22/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexMale
-
-