|
Case report: mri detection of uterine necrosis after uterine artery embolization for fibroids reported that two hours after the procedure, the patient complained of a small amount of vaginal bleeding and typical postembolization pain that was controlled with narcotic medication.She had persistent complaints of pelvic pain, and an mri was performed after the procedure.After mri, her pain was controlled with oral medication, and she was discharged the following day with no intraprocedural complications being noted.Four days after uterine artery embolization, the patient returned to her gynecologist for evaluation.She reported severe pain.The patient was afebrile with stable vital signs.Because of the mri findings suggesting minimal uterine perfusion, along with the clinical symptoms, a total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were performed 4 days after uterine artery embolization.The patient tolerated this procedure well and was discharged on day 3 after the operation.On gross inspection, the bivalved uterus was the size of a uterus in the 14th week of pregnancy and had a myometrial wall thickness of 5.5 cm.It contained a 5.5 × 5.5 × 4 cm submucosal mass with a tan-white-pink whorled cut surface.Microscopic examination revealed extensive necrosis of the endometrium and myometrium with a single necrotic leiomyoma.Case report address: https://ajronline.Org/doi/10.2214/ajr.183.3.1830733.
|
|
This event was identified during internal quality system activities.Upon review, the manufacturer determined the event meets fda criteria for reporting.The report is being submitted to ensure accuracy and completeness of mdr files.This submission does not reflect a change in device performance or patient risk.The awareness date corresponds to when the manufacturer became aware of the event details.All information reasonably known to the manufacturer at this time has been included.The suspect device was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, the complaint could not be confirmed, and the root cause could not be determined.A review of the device history and complaint database could not be performed since the lot number was not provided.
|