|
Product complaint # (b)(4) this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803 (and/or part 4, as applicable).This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.H11 additional narrative: d4: udi: as the lot number for the device involved in the event was not provided, the full udi is currently not available.H3, h6: an analysis of the product could not be performed since a physical sample was not received for evaluation.An evaluation of the manufacturing record could not be performed as the required product identification number was not provided to complete the evaluation.As part of our company quality system process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and distributed to approved specifications.Based on the information available, there is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition, therefore it has been determined that no corrective and preventive action is required at this time.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending as part of the post-market surveillance.However, if the product is received at a later date, the investigation will be updated as applicable.
|
|
It was reported that the patient experienced a traumatic brain injury after a motor vehicle accident in (b)(6) 2020.She experienced multiple injuries including vertebral fractures which resulted in spinal fusion surgery form c1-s1.Original surgery was performed in (b)(6) 2020 and did not include synthes devices.Surgery resulted in limited range of motion of head.Due to implant failures the patient had additional surgeries which involved adding synthes devices to the competitor products that were initially placed.During a series of revision and corrective spine procedures, the surgeon observed hardware failure at the cervicothoracic junction, including dislodgment and distraction of posterior instrumentation rods, severe kyphosis, and anterolisthesis at c3-c4.The cervical component of both connectors displaced, resulting in kyphosis and forward neck posture.The rods connecting the cervical to thoracic spine pulled out bilaterally, and misalignment of bilateral upper cervical rods with their corresponding connectors at c5-c6 was noted.The patient required multiple corrective invasive procedures, including device revision and replacement.Timeline of events: (b)(6) 2020-surgical invention due to competitor device failure.(b)(6) 2020 -surgical intervention due to implant failure.(b)(6) 2020 -surgical intervention due to implant failure(b)(6) 2021 -surgical intervention due to implant failure.(b)(6) 2021-surgical intervention due to implant failure.(b)(6) 2021- surgical intervention due to implant failure.(b)(6) 2021 - delayed wound healing requiring wound debridement and scalp rotation flap.This complaint captures the intervention which includes the reports for the dates (b)(6) 2021.
|