|
Product complaint: (b)(4).This is a combination product, and the event has been reviewed for both the suture and the triclosan.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number, and no related non-conformances were identified.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: reason product is not available: implanted was there any reported patient or user harm? yes.Did the patient/user require extended hospitalization as a result of the event? no.What is the patient¿s/user¿s status/outcome following the event? healthy.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent: please provide the patient's demographic information including age, gender, weight, bmi at the time of index procedure.Date and name of index surgical procedure? the diagnosis and indication for the index surgical procedure? were any concomitant procedures performed? on what tissue was the suture used? what was the tissue condition (normal, thin, calcified, fragile, diseased)? for the original intended closure, how were all layers closed? how was the suture placed (interrupted or continuous)? how was the suture originally tied (multiple knots, square knot, etc.)? please describe any medical/surgical intervention required for this suture event including dates and results.Did the operating surgeon observe any suture deficiency or anomaly before, during, after the suture placement or during any re-operation? please describe the patient manifestations of the reported infection (location, severity, appearance).Please provide the onset date/time of infection from the initial surgical procedure.Were there any pre-existing signs/symptoms of active infection prior to this surgical procedure? did the patient receive any prophylactic antibiotics pre-, intra- or post-operation? were cultures and sensitivities performed? if so, please provide the results.How much and what type of drainage is present in this wound? please describe any medical intervention performed including medication name and results.Were any pre-op cleansing procedures changed recently? if yes, please describe other relevant patient history/concomitant medications? what is the physician¿s opinion as to the etiology of or contributing factors to this event? what is the patient's current status?.
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent a dermatologic procedure on (b)(6) or (b)(6) 2026 and suture was used.The patient returned to the clinic with a surgical site infection.Since this rate is much higher that the normal percentage of patients with an ssi the hcp questions if there was a difference in the batch of sutures used.Besides, she mentioned that the patients with ssi were elderly with large wounds, which might also explain the hightened ssi percentage.Lot number thought to be xcbbwhc0 (however not certain).Additional information was requested.
|