| Model Number |
M004PF61M402 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Nonstandard Device (1420)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
05/13/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
It was indicated that the device will not be returned for evaluation.If there is any further relevant information obtained, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Detailed product information was not provided to bsc.We completed a good faith effort to obtain the information, but it was unable to be obtained.Because the product is unknown, we are unable to provide the unique identifier (udi) and other specific product information.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a pulmonary vein isolation procedure a farastar generator was selected for use.During the procedure, there was a generator was found to be defective and stopped working.The procedure had to be cancelled due to this event.No further information was provided.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a pulmonary vein isolation procedure a farastar generator was selected for use.During the procedure, there was a generator was found to be defective and stopped working.The procedure had to be cancelled due to this event.No patient complications were reported.No further information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
D2a: common device name: percutaneous cardiac ablation catheter for treatment of atrial fibrillation with irreversible electroporation; reported here as the common device name exceeded the character limit for designated field.E1: initial reporter first name- updated.Device technical analysis:
with all the available information, boston scientific is unable to confirm cause of the reported event.The product was not returned for analysis.Device history record review:
it was confirmed this device met specification prior to distribution and there were no manufacturing deviations which could have contributed to the reported event.Labeling review:
based on the information provided, there is no evidence that the device was used in a manner inconsistent with the labelled indications/instructions for use (ifu).Risk review:
a risk review performed for the farastar device confirmed that the generator operating differently than expected is known event defined in the products risk management documentation.This event type has been accounted for during product risk analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.Product risk benefit includes consideration of risk severity and rate, and the overall residual risk of the farastar device is acceptable.Investigation conclusion:
based on the available information, boston scientifics investigation findings were unable to establish a clear conclusion about the cause of the reported event.The device met all requirements prior to being approved for final distribution/sale and there was no evidence to suggest that the instructions for use (ifu) was not followed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|