• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 TRANSCATHETER; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 TRANSCATHETER; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9600TFX23A
Medical Device Problem Code Calcified (1077)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Dyspnea (1816)
Date of Event 05/14/2026
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Per the instructions for use (ifu), structural valve deterioration (wear, fracture, calcification, leaflet tear/tearing from the stent posts, leaflet retraction, suture line disruption of components of a prosthetic valve, thickening, stenosis), is a potential adverse event associated with bioprosthetic heart valves.Per a technical summary written by edwards lifesciences, calcific degeneration is a common cause of bioprosthetic heart valve failures.Many factors contribute to the onset and propagation of calcification.These include patient factors (age, disease state, pharmacological intervention, etc.), mechanical stress related to the valve's hemodynamic performance, and glutaraldehyde fixation of tissue.Of these, the fixation process is a relatively minor contributor to calcification for edwards' tissue valves due to subsequent anti-calcification treatments during manufacturing.Though numerous studies have been conducted on preventive calcification strategies in bioprosthetic heart valves, the causes of calcification are not fully understood and there are still no mechanisms or medical therapies which fully prevent bioprosthesis from calcifying.In this case, there was no allegation or indication a manufacturing non-conformance contributed to this product problem.The exact cause of the event was unable to be determined but may have been related to progression of disease, implant duration, and patient factors such as a history of aortic stenosis, htn, hld, psvt, dm, obesity, paf, and/or the mechanisms described above.Additionally it was reported that there was mild halt of all 3 leaflets, and some degree of patient-prosthesis mismatch.A review of edwards lifesciences risk management documentation was performed for this case.The reported event is an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure, additional assessment of this adverse event is not required at this time.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits monthly, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.As such, neither a product risk assessment, nor corrective or preventative actions are required at this time.
 
Event or Problem Description
As reported by implant patient registry, a patient underwent explant of their 23mm sapien 3 valve in the aortic position approximately 9 years and 1.5 months post transcatheter aortic valve replacement (tavr) procedure.The device was explanted and replaced with an edwards surgical valve.According to the medical record review, the patient was experiencing severe exertional shortness of breath, lethargy, dizziness, lightheadedness and bilateral lower extremity edema.An operative report was not provided, however a post operative follow up note indicated that the patient underwent tavr explant, aortic root replacement, pulmonary vein isolation (pvi) and left atrial appendage ligation.The patient was noted to be a poor valve in valve candidate due to anatomy and risk for coronary artery obstruction.The consultation notes indicated that the patient had severe stenosis with known patient prosthetic mismatch.A cta tavr noted the valve is grossly intact, there is mild halt of all 3 leaflets, no perivalvular leak.A tee performed approximately 9 years and 1 month post implant noted a tavr valve without significant stenosis and normal leaflet opening.The pathology report noted a medical device, metallic mesh, attached valvular tissue with fibrosis, and calcifications.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 TRANSCATHETER
Common Device Name
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key25609737
Report Number2015691-2026-16280
Device Sequence Number15903162
Product Code NPT
UDI-Device Identifier00690103194340
UDI-Public(01)00690103194340(17)171129
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateVA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P140031
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2017
Device Explanted Year2026
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 06/24/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/29/2017
Device Model Number9600TFX23A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/27/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/24/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured12/09/2016
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age69 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight120 KG
-
-