|
(b)(4).Date sent: 6/24/2026 d4: batch # 409d25.Investigation summary: the product was returned for evaluation.Visual inspection and functional testing were conducted on the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample determined that one ech60l device was returned with no apparent damage and with three gst60w reloads present.The reload (b) was received fully fired.The reload (c) was received unfired.The reload (c) was received fully fired with the pan detached from the reload.In addition, the reload pan was found lodged inside the channel.The pan was removed from the channel and the device was tested for functionality in the straight position with a test reload and achieved its complete firing sequence without any difficulties.The staple line and cut line were complete and the staples met the staple release criteria.It is possible that handling by the customer could dislodge the pan.Dislodgement as a result of the removal of the reload from the device is the most likely scenario.The event log was reviewed.An event was found that typically indicates that the knife encountered the firing safety lockout mechanism.This mechanism ensures that the knife cannot deploy without an unfired reload installed.It is possible that it occurred due to improper installation of the reload.Always ensure that the retaining cap is in place when a reload is installed into a device.As part of ethicon endo surgery¿s quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished ech60l, with lot number a97v40, and no non-conformances were identified.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device batch number 409d25, and no non-conformances were identified.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|