• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: RESPIRONICS, INC. TRILOGY; VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, FACILITY USE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

RESPIRONICS, INC. TRILOGY; VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, FACILITY USE Back to Search Results
Model Number 1054096
Medical Device Problem Codes Circuit Failure (1089); Electrical /Electronic Property Problem (1198)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 06/15/2026
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The reported failure of the trilogy 100 ventilator machine flow sensor and sensor printed circuit board is accommodated in the product risk management file as being linked to hazard with description patient exposure to function / deterioration of function.Complaints for this failure are reviewed via the post market complaint trending and escalation processes to assess for the observed probability levels and compare them with the predicted levels in the risk file for the hazards linked to the failure.As of the date of submission for this report, there is no indication that complaints for the failure in question has led to unacceptable increase in probability levels for the hazardous situations in scope, and therefore no further action will be pursued.Qa continues to monitor complaints for this issue per the cadence in the complaint trending procedures.The device mentioned in this complaint has exceeded its useful life per the applicable ifu.Therefore, the dhr for this device will not be reviewed at this time.However, the dhr files for this device are available and can be accessed upon specific request.
 
Event or Problem Description
The manufacturer received information that a trilogy 100 ventilator was returned to a third-party service center for evaluation.There was no harm or injury reported.It was reported there were no visible foam particles in the device.Technical findings on device evaluation indicated the machine flow sensor and the sensor printed circuit board assembly were defective.The evaluation details indicate no device error codes were reported, and the action taken was "unrepaiired".The device operating software was reported to have been upgraded.The evaluation reported the device did not pass final testing.Additional findings not related to the malfunction/issue: it was reported the interface printed circuit board assembly was physically damaged and the blower was "noisy".If additional information is received, a follow-up report will be filed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRILOGY
Common Device Name
VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, FACILITY USE
Manufacturer (Section D)
RESPIRONICS, INC.
1001 murry ridge lane
murrysville PA
Manufacturer (Section G)
RESPIRONICS, INC.
1001 murry ridge lane
murrysville PA
Manufacturer Contact
melissa rosko
1001 murry ridge lane
murrysville, PA 
7247330200
MDR Report Key25635751
Report Number2518422-2026-026565
Device Sequence Number9561991
Product Code CBK
UDI-Device Identifier00606959022744
UDI-Public(01)00606959022744
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryTU
PMA/510(K) Number
K083526
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Y
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 06/26/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Model Number1054096
Device Catalogue Number1054096
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/15/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/26/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured09/25/2015
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-