• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: RESPIRONICS, INC. BIPAP SYSTEM ONE 60 SERIES; VENTILATOR, NON-CONTINUOUS (RESPIRATOR)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

RESPIRONICS, INC. BIPAP SYSTEM ONE 60 SERIES; VENTILATOR, NON-CONTINUOUS (RESPIRATOR) Back to Search Results
Model Number 660P
Medical Device Problem Code Degraded (1153)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 06/05/2026
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device mentioned in this complaint has exceeded its useful life per the applicable ifu.The affected products with field complaints alleging pe-pur foam degradation have undergone the establishment of complaint codes specifically identifying foam degradation, for dream station cpap/bipap series.A field correction action (2021-06-a) was initiated, and medical device recall letters were issued.A field action was initiated to replace pe-pur foam in affected products; degradation was added to the respective dfmeas and the risk management file that was current at the time ¿ (b)(4) was updated to include hazards associated with foam degradation based on complaints analyzed through various health hazard evaluations (hhes).Risk tags ¿ degrad04, irrit05 reflected the safety risk assessment of design containing the affected pe-pur foam.These complaints were monitored and trended in accordance with the complaint trending procedures.If the complaints were determined to meet the criteria for escalation, they were escalated for risk assessment through the post market clinical escalation process.As of the date of submission for this report, there is no indication that complaints for the failure in question have led to unacceptable levels of severity or probabilities of harm, and therefore no further action will be pursued.
 
Event or Problem Description
A bipap pro device was returned to a third-party service center with no initial alleged complaint.There was no report of serious or permanent harm or injury, and no medical intervention was reported.During evaluation at the third-party service center, the device was visually inspected, and evidence of foam degradation was identified.Evaluation of the device data also identified unrelated error codes.These error codes were consistent with normal device operation and expected use conditions and were not considered reportable under medical device reporting requirements.No evidence was identified to suggest that the error codes contributed to or caused the reported event.Following completion of the evaluation, the device was scrapped by the service center.No additional information is available.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BIPAP SYSTEM ONE 60 SERIES
Common Device Name
VENTILATOR, NON-CONTINUOUS (RESPIRATOR)
Manufacturer (Section D)
RESPIRONICS, INC.
1001 murry ridge lane
murrysville PA
Manufacturer (Section G)
RESPIRONICS, INC.
1001 murry ridge lane
murrysville PA
Manufacturer Contact
melissa rosko
1001 murry ridge lane
murrysville, PA 
7247330200
MDR Report Key25639745
Report Number2518422-2026-026842
Device Sequence Number15843372
Product Code BZD
UDI-Device Identifier00606959031166
UDI-Public00606959031166
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StatePA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K131982
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Remedial Action Recall
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 06/26/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Model Number660P
Device Catalogue Number660P
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/05/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/26/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured01/10/2013
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Reuse
If action reported to FDA under 21 USC 360i(g), list
FDA-assigned Recall Number or include a statement
Z-1974-2021
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-