• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ACCOLADE? SR; PACEMAKER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ACCOLADE? SR; PACEMAKER Back to Search Results
Model Number L300
Medical Device Problem Codes Signal Artifact/Noise (1036); Nonstandard Device (1420); Over-Sensing (1438)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 12/05/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Upon receipt at our post market quality assurance laboratory, this device was thoroughly inspected and analyzed.A high current drain was detected, but the battery still supported full device function.Detailed analysis confirmed the identified high current drain was a result of compromised capacitors.This resulted in the observed premature battery depletion.It was determined that the capacitors were compromised due to the presence of excess hydrogen in the device case.This particular device is included in the hydrogen induced premature depletion advisory population.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed.The review of the dhr identified that there were no process related non-conformances, scrap, or rework performed during the production that could explain the event.The reviews ensure each device meets specification prior to release for use.There is no indication the device manufacturing process contributed to the reported complaint.A risk review was completed and confirmed that the event of mv/rrt noise or oversensing was defined in the risk documentation.This event type has been accounted for during product risk analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.Review of labeling determined that the complaint situation was listed in the manual.There was no indication in the complaint that the product was not used in accordance with labeling.The manual was unlikely to be the cause of the reported complaint; translation, wording, or graphics does not require further review.If pertinent information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that this pacemaker recorded a signal artifact monitoring (sam) episode due to noise artifact of the minute ventilation (mv) feature signal.Which was caused by electromagnetic interference (emi).Leading to the minute ventilation (mv) feature being automatically disabled.All measurements were within normal range.No programming changes were recommended.At this time, the pacemaker remains in service and no adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ACCOLADE? SR
Common Device Name
PACEMAKER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
cashel road
clonmel
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
timothy degroot
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul, MN 55112
6515826168
MDR Report Key25659560
Report Number2124215-2026-34608
Device Sequence Number16066938
Product Code LWP
UDI-Device Identifier00802526559150
UDI-Public(01)00802526559150(17)180922
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
N970003
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2016
Device Explanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Remedial Action Recall,Notification
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 06/29/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date09/22/2018
Device Model NumberL300
Device Catalogue NumberL300
Device Lot Number713703
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/12/2025
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/24/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/29/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/04/2016
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age79 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-