|
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. True Flow Dilatation Catheter; PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
TF0203511 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Difficult to Remove (1528); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Material Deformation (2976)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
06/16/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.Section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6) 2026, a patient underwent a valvuloplasty procedure using the true flow balloon.During balloon removal, resistance was encountered, and the balloon was noted to be slightly deformed.The procedure was completed without removal of the kevlar protective layer.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6)2026, a patient underwent a valvuloplasty procedure using the true flow balloon.During balloon removal, resistance was encountered, and the balloon was noted to be slightly deformed.The procedure was completed without removal of the kevlar protective layer.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6) 2026, a patient underwent a valvuloplasty procedure using the true flow balloon.During balloon removal, resistance was encountered, and the balloon was noted to be slightly deformed.The outer kevlar protective layer was seen on the balloon.The outer layer was removed after the balloon had been removed from the patient.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported sheath removal difficulty and material deformation as no objective evidence was provided for review.However, the investigation is confirmed for the reported incorrect procedure issue as the reported event states, the balloon protector was removed only after the device was used which was against the instructions for use.A definitive root cause for the reported difficult to remove and deformation could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.D4 (unique identifier (udi) #), g3, h6 (component, method, result, conclusion)
section a through f : the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed, and this lot met all release criteria.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported sheath removal difficulty and material deformation as no objective evidence was provided for review.However, the investigation is confirmed for the reported incorrect procedure issue as the reported event states, the balloon protector was removed only after the device was used which was against the instruction for use.A definitive root cause for the reported difficult to remove and deformation could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.B5, g3.Section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|