| Catalog Number |
VC-10A25-6F-100 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Burn(s) (1757)
|
| Date of Event |
02/26/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported is unknown.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failure as no objective evidence was provided for review.A definitive root cause for the reported skin burn could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6) 2026, a patient underwent a radiofrequency ablation procedure using the venclose catheter.Following the procedure, the patient experienced second degree burns and presented to a general practitioner the following day.The patient status is unknown.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6)2026, a patient underwent a radiofrequency ablation procedure using the venclose catheter.Following the procedure, the patient experienced second degree burns and presented to a general practitioner the following day.The patient status is unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: this supplemental report is submitted to correct an error in the previously submitted reports.The initial mdr captured an incorrect manufacturing location (g1).The correct manufacturing location for this device is viant costa rica, s.A.No new event information is being reported in this supplement.Manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported is unknown.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failure as no objective evidence was provided for review.A definitive root cause for the reported skin burn could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.G1, g3.Section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|