| Model Number |
72404127 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Migration (4003)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
06/19/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device is not available for analysis; therefore, no physical analysis of the product could be performed.The reported device performance allegation cannot be confirmed.Migration is acknowledged within the instructions for use (ifu) and is not related to off-label use or failure to follow instructions.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient with an artificial urinary sphincter (aus) presented with a control pump that was inaccessible in the scrotum.A revision surgery was performed, during which the physician confirmed that the control pump had migrated from its intended implant location on the right side of the anterior scrotum to the right far dependent scrotum underneath the testicle, rendering it inaccessible to the patient.The control pump was explanted and replaced.There were no patient complications.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient with an artificial urinary sphincter (aus) presented with a control pump that was inaccessible in the scrotum.A revision surgery was performed, during which the physician confirmed that the control pump had migrated from its intended implant location on the right side of the anterior scrotum to the right far dependent scrotum underneath the testicle, rendering it inaccessible to the patient.The control pump was explanted and replaced.There were no patient complications.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device is not available for analysis; therefore, no physical analysis of the product could be performed.The reported device performance allegation cannot be confirmed.Migration is acknowledged within the instructions for use (ifu) and is not related to off label use or failure to follow instructions.The device history record (dhr) confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.A risk review confirmed that the event of migration was defined in the product risk documentation.This event type has been accounted for during analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.Based on the information available, a conclusion code of adverse event related to procedure was assigned to this investigation.There are procedural-related factors that may have contributed to the observed issue.According to timeline regarding implantation of device, this event is most likely related to post-operative adverse events referenced within instructions for use and hazard analysis documentation.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|