|
Continued: e.1.Phone number: (b)(6).A review of the device history record has been completed.No deviations or non-conformance's noted.Further information from the reporter regarding event, product, or patient details has been requested.No additional information is available at this time.Reason for reoperation: rupture.
|
|
Additional, changed, and/or corrected data: d.9, h.3, h.6.Device evaluation: per the investigation procedure, the device is analyzed through visual inspection microscopic inspection if openings are observed and a weight verification.Per the analysis performed, the assessments of the complaints and any potential manufacturing issue are displayed along with any further actions required:
- rupture: observed multiple openings through microscopic inspection assessed as surgical damage, observed broken device through microscopic inspection assessed as unidentified (tear) opening, surgical damage and observed a missing piece of shell through microscopic inspection assessed as inconclusive.No further actions are required as it is not related to the manufacturing process.None of the other observations performed during the device analysis creases are found to be potentially related to the manufacturing process, and, therefore, no further actions are required for these observations.
|