|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a coredx pulmonary forceps was used during bronchoscopy procedure on an unknown date.During the procedure, the forceps malfunctioned and could not be used to obtain a sample due to the jaws not closing once opened.Attempts to obtain additional information regarding the circumstances surrounding this event have been unsuccessful to date.Should additional relevant details become available, a supplemental report will be submitted.
|
|
Block b3:
approximated based on the date the manufacturer became aware of the event.Block h6:
imdrf device code a051104 captures the reportable event of jaws failure to close.Block h11:
the complaint device was not returned therefore, product analysis could not be performed, for this reason and due to the lack of evidence is unable to confirm the reported event.It was confirmed this device met manufacturing specification prior to distribution and there were no manufacturing deviations which could have contributed to the reported event.A risk review was completed and confirmed that the event of "jaws failure to close" was defined in the risk documentation.This event type has been accounted for during product risk analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.A similar complaint review was completed.There were no emerging trends identified that warrant further action.Based on the event description and information provided by the customer there is not enough evidence to determine whether the jaws failure to close were due to the physician's manipulation/technique during the procedure or related to a device malfunction, cause not established is selected as the most probable cause for this event.Additionally, due to lack of evidence and without proper evaluation of the device, this investigation is assigned a most probable conclusion code of "cause not established" the conclusion is acceptable because of the analysis of the available information in the complaint did not determine a more specific complaint cause, in addition, without physical evaluation of the device, it remains unknown the most probable causes that contributed to the event.Also, the evidence from the product record review did not identify a potential product quality issue or new patient harm.
|